• StarCraft 2 Blog on Facebook
Blizzard’s Patching Policy Revealed; New Situation Report

Bashiok, Blizzard’s community manager, has posted on the battle.net forums, discussing a subject that’s on the mind of every StarCraft 2 player: gameplay balance and patches that change it. The thread began with worries that Blizzard is keeping the game in an unbalanced form that will only be addressed by the next expansion, Heart of the Swarm, when it introduces new units and balance changes.

First of all, Bashiok quickly dispels this myth:

Our intent is not to have a game with broken balance in an attempt to sell an expansion. That should go without saying. It makes me sad it isn’t.

Next, he clarifies Blizzard’s approach to patching:

Our intent is also to not apply knee jerk fixes based on the first few weeks as understanding of the game and strategies are still in flux. The game is young, and we don’t feel that it would have been helpful to progressing peoples understanding by throwing in tons of fixes based on flavor-of-the-week (or day, or hour) strats.


We see a lot of variation between the regions. Making a change for how NA players play may be completely ridiculous for how KR players play, and actually mess up a balance there. For instance 10 of their top 20 players are zerg. So that’s one place where we have to be mindful and careful and attack balance issues with great prejudice.

Unlike during the beta, Blizzard can’t afford to patch the game every few days or radically alter components of the game for a test run. “Real” patches are indeed coming, but they will be heavily scrutinized first to make sure the introduced balance changes are worthy:

That said. There are balance changes coming. What everyone was seeing in beta with tons of quick balance changes are because it was in beta and we feel we can get away with throwing out a lot of ‘we think this may help’ type fixes. With a live environment we’re not going to throw stuff out there unless we’re pretty sure. We’ve played. We’ve looked at data. We’ve looked at each region. And then we act. Which isn’t to say we may not be wrong from time to time, but it’s a more measured approach than beta players may be used to or expecting.

There you have it! Balance changes are coming, and they’ll be thought out and tested before we’re exposed to them. Indeed, in mid-September, Blizzard is planning on releasing the first real patch, and they’ve already released a situation report detailing some of the planned changes:

Patch 1.1 will contain a number of improvements including additional mod features, Editor improvements and bug fixes, some custom game improvements, support for NVIDIA’s 3D Vision, and more. We’d also like to share some specific plans for this patch with you.

Balance Changes

We have several balance changes in store. One general change we’re making is that friendly units will no longer provide vision after being killed. Enemy units previously revealed will no longer be targetable. Now let’s break down the additional balance changes we’re implementing.

This changes the way vision works so that units that are killed immediately lose the vision they provided on the field. Previously, killed units would still supply intelligence for a few short seconds, allowing players to jump to the location of the “under attack!” ping and see exactly what had happened.

Maps

We’re going to be adding destructible rocks to the Desert Oasis map to make natural expansions easier to protect. In addition, the center map watchtower area is being narrowed.

Protoss

We have two key changes in mind for the zealot: the build time is being increased from 33 to 38 seconds, and the warpgate cooldown is being increased from 23 to 28 seconds. Zealot rushes are currently too powerful at various skill levels, particularly those that rely on rapidly assaulting an enemy base from nearby “proxy” gateways. We feel the window players have to scout for and fend off this rush is too small. We also want to address the problem of protoss being able to dump minerals a bit too quickly with the combination of warpgates and Chrono Boost.

While this gives victims of proxy gateway rushes a little more breathing room, it also puts Protoss players in danger of getting Zerglings going past their choke point just slightly before the first bouncer Zealot comes out.

Proxy Gateway

The late-game effect that slightly hinders the Protoss’ ability to mass up Zealots quickly is also no doubt a reaction to the following Siege Tank change:

Terran

There are several changes in the works for terrans. Reapers against zerg are stronger than expected. Due to the zealot build time increase, reapers would be a bit problematic in combination with proxy barracks, bunkers, and/or marauders against protoss. Therefore, we have decided to increase the build time of reapers as well from 40 to 45 seconds. Fast reaper + bunker, or fast marine + bunker rushes are problematic against zerg. Although this rush would never outright destroy the zerg player, we feel zerg suffers too much of a disadvantage from either having to cancel the fast expansion, or getting trapped inside the main base for too long, so we are also increasing the bunker build time from 30 to 35 seconds.


Siege tanks in large numbers are performing too well in all matchups. In the mid- to late-game, siege tanks are too dominant against all ground units. We want a small set of light and unarmored ground units to perform better against siege tanks. With this in mind, we’re changing the Siege Mode damage of the siege tank from 50 to 35, +15 vs. armored; to correspond with this, damage upgrades will be changed from +5 to +3, +2 vs. armored. This change reduces the base damage of the siege tank against light and unarmored units, as well as the splash damage.

Siege Tanks will now perform more like their StarCraft 1 Predecessors, dealing less damage to light-armored units like the Zealot, Marine, Zergling, and Hydralisk. A huge change for this unit that the Terran race has come to rely on, Tanks in siege mode will now be significantly less deadly to these units. Hydralisks will need 3 shots instead of 2 to be killed; carapace-upgraded Zerlings will survive the first shot, non-stimmed Marines will as well. Zealots, already capable of taking some tank fire while charging in to the battle, will be able to take one extra hit as well and survive 5 direct shots. This is not the first nerf to the Siege Tank, which has already had its damage lowered from 60 to 50 during the beta.

Siege Tanks will now benefit greatly from the +1 damage upgrade, allowing them to one shot Zerglings regardless of upgrades. A +2 attack Siege Tank will two-shot Hydralisks again, even if the Hydralisk is +2 carapace upgraded itself.

Battlecruisers currently lack good counters from the ground and still perform very well against a wide array of unit types. We’re aware that it is not easy to get battlecruisers out for the cost, but at the same time, it is possible in both 1v1s and team games to create stalemate situations to bring them out. Overall, we feel that battlecruisers are too strong for their cost, and the terran-forced stalemate situations are causing less interesting gameplay. We will be lowering their damage against ground units from 10 to 8.

Zerg

Ultralisk damage is being decreased from 15, +25 vs. armored to 15, +20 vs. armored. This reduction is comparable to the changes being made to the battlecruiser and siege tank. Like the battlecruiser, ultralisks are simply too powerful for the cost, even though they are difficult to muster. Also, in combination with other units, ultralisks are difficult to counter from the ground. The ultralisk building attack (Ram) is being removed because the damage rate is too similar to its normal attack, which will be used against buildings instead. When ultralisks target tightly packed smaller buildings such as supply depots, the Ram attack is actually outputting considerably less overall damage than its normal attack, as Ram only hits a single target.

The Ultralisk, which was highly underused during the beta, has finally been seeing use since the release of the game thanks to the final patches of the beta that have improved the unit’s damage, speed, and have given it a permanent “frenzy” effect along with the ability to break down Sentry Force-Fields. This is has made it quite devastating in some situation, so the current damage reduction definitely makes sense. On the other hand, Ultralisks will now be better than ever for breaking down tight chokes, as their AoE melee attack will be used against buildings as well.

Interesting changes all around, and these are only some of the promised ones to come in the next patch!

In a hilarious and predictable turn of events, that will perhaps prevent Blizzard from releasing these situation reports prematurely in the future, players who had read the report and have noted that Zealot proxy rushes and Siege Tanks are overpowered are abusing those to the max while they still can. Be warned!

Be Sociable, Share!
Google+

Related Posts:


20 Comments to “Blizzard’s Patching Policy Revealed; New Situation Report”


  1. Ant — August 29, 2010 @ 10:29 am

    Hmmm…I wonder if there’s any connection between the “…how KR players play…For instance 10 of their top 20 players are zerg” and the fact that these changes are basically all to help Zerg.

  2. billyboy — August 29, 2010 @ 1:46 pm

    Perhaps the KRs are just used to zerg form sc1? Maybe that’s why zerg is so dominant. Am I wrong is assuming more of them played zerg in the end? It just seemed like that to me.

  3. z32o — August 29, 2010 @ 3:25 pm

    There is plenty of discussion on how Zerg were lacking options on assaulting Terrans on maps with chokes and high ground.

    The main problem found was that Zerg, which now don’t have Dark Swarm ability (from SC1; ability that you casted on the ground and any zerg unit inside would be protected from ranged atks for a short period of time) can’t break through a choke without losing almost an entire army to Siege Tanks & fortified Terran defense.

    Zerg has become a containing race, instead of a swarming race. Zerg can no longer rely on speed. It needs to have creep to defend/attack. Hydralisks/Ultralisks are so slow off creep it’s dangerous for them to leave it. That is why the most used Zerg unit composition nowadays is Mutalisks+Speedlings, it’s great for harass; it covers each other as an army; great for map control; and forces your opponent to build T1 units and Turrets.

    I think they did the right thing, not buffing the Zerg; instead nerfing the other races.

    Anyone who watched the Intel Extreme Masters Global Challenge 2010 final match MorroW vs IdrA would predict the changes to the reapers; as Zerg has no options to defend against it without suffering the aforementioned economical loss. Even IdrA, who plays Macro perfectly has made mistakes and his minerals/gas were over 1000 on the single match he was able to outmicro MorroW’s army with Roaches (w/speed upgrade).

    So definitely a welcome change.

    Also, Siege Tanks are being abused to hell.
    Great to see it’s damage altered. Now I guess it’s a no-brainer for Zerg to upgrade Ground Armor +1 if his opponent is going for Tanks.

    Cheers guys,
    z32o

  4. Spiral Architect — August 29, 2010 @ 6:16 pm

    ^ Good post dude.

    I suppose now Hellions will have to complement the Terran army since you can’t rely on Tanks to clean up everything.

  5. Heh — August 30, 2010 @ 3:49 am

    Hardly anyone’s using the Ultras due to their poor choke point usability and they nerfed it to 20. Way to go Blizz for making Terran and Protoss the only races being used.

  6. Anonymous — August 30, 2010 @ 9:01 pm

    Will they be fixing the problem with Ati Graphics cards causing the game to crash

  7. anon — August 31, 2010 @ 4:02 am

    What ATI crash ? running 2 x 4870 . no crash 70-100fps.

  8. Warren — August 31, 2010 @ 6:07 pm

    Seriously…nothing is being done about the void rays? It is my opinion that they are the most abused unit in the game. I’d say, take away their ability to target air.

  9. Anonymous — August 31, 2010 @ 9:30 pm

    Ati HD5850 bought specially for SC2 will run for only 10 minutes when playing the game perfect for everything else. This problem has been noted on other forums.

  10. Anonymous — September 3, 2010 @ 7:20 am

    What about voice chat issues? Are we ever going to get a fix that actually allows us to use in game voice chat? As it is right now, I can only hear 3 of 6 online friends and they cannot hear me either, while 1 of my friends can hear all of us. Seriously needs to be addressed.

  11. streaky — September 4, 2010 @ 4:10 pm

    Speaking of balance patches, can we do something about parties against badly matched individuals too? People keep loosing badly to big parties because they can communicate better and are used to playing with other, it’s beyond unfair especially when the teams are stacked anyways.

  12. Henry Ljungquist — June 17, 2011 @ 9:27 pm

    Check out the weather in San Francisco!

  13. resources — May 11, 2013 @ 6:27 am

    What you published made a lot of sense. However, what about this?
    suppose you were to create a killer title?
    I ain’t suggesting your content is not good., however what if you added a post title to maybe get a person’s attention?
    I mean Blizzards Patching Policy Revealed; New Situation Report | SC2 Blog is a little plain.
    You should glance at Yahoo’s front page and watch how they create post headlines to get people interested. You might add a related video or a related picture or two to get readers interested about what you’ve got to say.

    Just my opinion, it would make your website a little livelier.

  14. LeBron James Shoes For Sale — June 25, 2013 @ 12:39 am

    hello!,I love your writing so so much! share we keep in touch extra approximately your
    article on AOL? I need an expert on this house to unravel my problem.
    May be that is you! Taking a look forward to peer you.

  15. Keith — July 24, 2013 @ 2:36 pm

    The michael kors outlet have shown surprising resilience in their ability
    to withstand challenges from other owners trying
    to make it 28-10. Morgan is from Canton, Ohio, where one of his favourite players,
    Glenn Hoddle, for his favourite team, Tottenham Hotspur.

  16. creme para olheiras — September 1, 2014 @ 11:29 am

    Even so, try to make face black bbut also gives you a natural and inevitable.
    But the downside can gooogle be good. There are man ways, only three drops of your nose, middle eyebrow and
    eyelid may try a gel format. Danny Kayye got onne iron here and lett it remain for approximately $19 millioon each, google the scientists knew who received the Boots cream increased fibrillin production. When you get rid of wrinkles.
    Sugar in the number of hohrs in the quiiet of their.

    Review my web page :: creme para olheiras

  17. e-pisanieprac.net — October 10, 2014 @ 1:04 pm

    Every weekend i used to go to see this site, for the reason that i wish for enjoyment, since this
    this website conations genuinely fastidious funny material too.

  18. Wayne — October 16, 2014 @ 11:40 pm

    I quite like reading an article that will make men and women think.
    Also, many thanks for permitting me to comment!

  19. www.youtube.com — October 22, 2014 @ 12:07 am

    I like the helpful information you supply on your articles.
    I’ll bookmark your blog and check again right
    here frequently. I’m slightly certaqin I’ll learn plenty of new stuff proper right
    here! Best of luck for the following!

  20. www.youtube.com — October 22, 2014 @ 6:41 pm

    hi!,I really like your writing very much!
    percentag we communicate extra about your
    post on AOL? I require a specialist in this area to solve my problem.
    Maybe that’s you! Having a look ahead to look you.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Write a comment


Name




«

»

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
All the Rest © SC2 blog 2007-2010