<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: StarCraft 2 Battle Report 2 &#8211; Review and Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sc2blog.com/2009/04/18/starcraft-2-battle-report-2-review-and-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2009/04/18/starcraft-2-battle-report-2-review-and-analysis/</link>
	<description>The Official Unofficial StarCraft 2 Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:54:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Arthur</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2009/04/18/starcraft-2-battle-report-2-review-and-analysis/#comment-9770</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/?p=1833#comment-9770</guid>
		<description>If the LAN is really disabled as I heard, I&#039;ll never buy this game, Blizzard is too much of a f*ck*ng mercenary whore, they just care about money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the LAN is really disabled as I heard, I&#8217;ll never buy this game, Blizzard is too much of a f*ck*ng mercenary whore, they just care about money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2009/04/18/starcraft-2-battle-report-2-review-and-analysis/#comment-9769</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/?p=1833#comment-9769</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m kind of disappointed with SC2, the graphics look very nice and sh*t, but I see to big changes from SC1, there&#039;s nothing revolutionary about it and I do think the Zerg were nerfed and the protoss were overpowered (immortals aginst some units, mothership, etc), while the terran remains kind of the same.

I guess if units had different attacks, as ranged and melee atack as the Hydra does now, it would be cool, Hydra&#039;s not melee atacking doesn&#039;t make sense at all, since they have blade shaped arms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m kind of disappointed with SC2, the graphics look very nice and sh*t, but I see to big changes from SC1, there&#8217;s nothing revolutionary about it and I do think the Zerg were nerfed and the protoss were overpowered (immortals aginst some units, mothership, etc), while the terran remains kind of the same.</p>
<p>I guess if units had different attacks, as ranged and melee atack as the Hydra does now, it would be cool, Hydra&#8217;s not melee atacking doesn&#8217;t make sense at all, since they have blade shaped arms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Introspective</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2009/04/18/starcraft-2-battle-report-2-review-and-analysis/#comment-9686</link>
		<dc:creator>Introspective</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 07:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/?p=1833#comment-9686</guid>
		<description>The trailers shows that sequel will be at least as good as original was. But this delaying of game launch seems more matter of monetization strategy, not development issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The trailers shows that sequel will be at least as good as original was. But this delaying of game launch seems more matter of monetization strategy, not development issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2009/04/18/starcraft-2-battle-report-2-review-and-analysis/#comment-9248</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/?p=1833#comment-9248</guid>
		<description>Bwahahaha, probably a picture of one of the developers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bwahahaha, probably a picture of one of the developers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2009/04/18/starcraft-2-battle-report-2-review-and-analysis/#comment-9247</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 06:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/?p=1833#comment-9247</guid>
		<description>lol i didn&#039;t notice that, that&#039;s the graphic for infested terran</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol i didn&#8217;t notice that, that&#8217;s the graphic for infested terran</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chronos</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2009/04/18/starcraft-2-battle-report-2-review-and-analysis/#comment-9245</link>
		<dc:creator>Chronos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/?p=1833#comment-9245</guid>
		<description>The angry man !

http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6098/angryman.jpg

Baneling shaped brownies please ^^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The angry man !</p>
<p><a href="http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6098/angryman.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6098/angryman.jpg</a></p>
<p>Baneling shaped brownies please ^^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unregistered</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2009/04/18/starcraft-2-battle-report-2-review-and-analysis/#comment-9244</link>
		<dc:creator>Unregistered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/?p=1833#comment-9244</guid>
		<description>Oh man. Not another newbie battle report.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh man. Not another newbie battle report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chronos</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2009/04/18/starcraft-2-battle-report-2-review-and-analysis/#comment-9241</link>
		<dc:creator>Chronos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/?p=1833#comment-9241</guid>
		<description>It Looks that every zerg unit exept the overlord is missing it&#039;s death animation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It Looks that every zerg unit exept the overlord is missing it&#8217;s death animation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Battlarmd</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2009/04/18/starcraft-2-battle-report-2-review-and-analysis/#comment-9239</link>
		<dc:creator>Battlarmd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/?p=1833#comment-9239</guid>
		<description>From the battle report.. I do wonder why tier the medivac dropship is at. I do feel it would have changed the pace of the game a lot. The Banelings were trouble, but again, the terran could have just place 1 seige tank on the cliff, and everything would have changed... guess we are newbie still.

zerg wise, nothing was too creatively done. I find it disappointing.  In fact, the units in the battle report was almost ALL SC1 units.. except for Queen/Banshee/Marauders which did almost nothing. The roaches and reapers both did something, worth mentioning.

The mule drop was interesting, made the expansion start really quickly, that was something. The queen&#039;s spawn of larva was also interesting, though it you have to keep pressing spawn .. it will be annoying... I wonder can blizzard make the queen &#039;crouch-on-top&#039; of the hatchery, making it seemingly a part of the building until either the hatchery gets destroyed, the queen moves, or the queen dies.. a hatchery with a queen on it wll spawn larva at the blizz proposed rate... that will be interesting..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the battle report.. I do wonder why tier the medivac dropship is at. I do feel it would have changed the pace of the game a lot. The Banelings were trouble, but again, the terran could have just place 1 seige tank on the cliff, and everything would have changed&#8230; guess we are newbie still.</p>
<p>zerg wise, nothing was too creatively done. I find it disappointing.  In fact, the units in the battle report was almost ALL SC1 units.. except for Queen/Banshee/Marauders which did almost nothing. The roaches and reapers both did something, worth mentioning.</p>
<p>The mule drop was interesting, made the expansion start really quickly, that was something. The queen&#8217;s spawn of larva was also interesting, though it you have to keep pressing spawn .. it will be annoying&#8230; I wonder can blizzard make the queen &#8216;crouch-on-top&#8217; of the hatchery, making it seemingly a part of the building until either the hatchery gets destroyed, the queen moves, or the queen dies.. a hatchery with a queen on it wll spawn larva at the blizz proposed rate&#8230; that will be interesting..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chronos</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2009/04/18/starcraft-2-battle-report-2-review-and-analysis/#comment-9238</link>
		<dc:creator>Chronos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 02:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/?p=1833#comment-9238</guid>
		<description>THere&#039;s a Nighthawk who gets killed by its own Missile when he kills the banelings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THere&#8217;s a Nighthawk who gets killed by its own Missile when he kills the banelings</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
