<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: StarCraft 2 System Requirements Revealed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/05/22/starcraft-2-system-requirements-revealed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/05/22/starcraft-2-system-requirements-revealed/</link>
	<description>The Official Unofficial StarCraft 2 Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:12:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: effexorr</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/05/22/starcraft-2-system-requirements-revealed/#comment-19711</link>
		<dc:creator>effexorr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 23:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/?p=970#comment-19711</guid>
		<description>weight loss with http://www.rxmedkit.com/item.php?group_id=&amp;id=258 - effexor and weight loss no rx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>weight loss with <a href="http://www.rxmedkit.com/item.php?group_id=&#038;id=258" rel="nofollow">http://www.rxmedkit.com/item.php?group_id=&#038;id=258</a> &#8211; effexor and weight loss no rx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/05/22/starcraft-2-system-requirements-revealed/#comment-11735</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/?p=970#comment-11735</guid>
		<description>will that be enough to run starcraft 2 at max settings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>will that be enough to run starcraft 2 at max settings</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/05/22/starcraft-2-system-requirements-revealed/#comment-11734</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/?p=970#comment-11734</guid>
		<description>i dont know much about computers but i have a quad-core processor running at 3.2 GHz

1TB (1000MB)Harddrive
HD 4870X2 graphics card
8 GB RAM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont know much about computers but i have a quad-core processor running at 3.2 GHz</p>
<p>1TB (1000MB)Harddrive<br />
HD 4870X2 graphics card<br />
8 GB RAM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/05/22/starcraft-2-system-requirements-revealed/#comment-11733</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/?p=970#comment-11733</guid>
		<description>f</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>f</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isaac</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/05/22/starcraft-2-system-requirements-revealed/#comment-11437</link>
		<dc:creator>Isaac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 20:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/?p=970#comment-11437</guid>
		<description>GTX 480 
16 GB G Skill RAM
AMD 1090T Phenom II X6
..... i think im past the max settings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GTX 480<br />
16 GB G Skill RAM<br />
AMD 1090T Phenom II X6<br />
&#8230;.. i think im past the max settings</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Punk Busta</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/05/22/starcraft-2-system-requirements-revealed/#comment-11418</link>
		<dc:creator>Punk Busta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 18:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/?p=970#comment-11418</guid>
		<description>I was wodering if my new Lap Top will be able to run Star Craft 2 at full graphics without problems 

Dell Studio 1558 
4gig&#039;s ddr3 1333 
Radeon mobility 4570 

I have been looking at the beta clips on you tube and i see there is an HD mode for the game wonder how that will make my Lap Top crawl any comments appreciated</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wodering if my new Lap Top will be able to run Star Craft 2 at full graphics without problems </p>
<p>Dell Studio 1558<br />
4gig&#8217;s ddr3 1333<br />
Radeon mobility 4570 </p>
<p>I have been looking at the beta clips on you tube and i see there is an HD mode for the game wonder how that will make my Lap Top crawl any comments appreciated</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Water Dragon 20</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/05/22/starcraft-2-system-requirements-revealed/#comment-11407</link>
		<dc:creator>Water Dragon 20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 04:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/?p=970#comment-11407</guid>
		<description>I have a AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black series at 3.72Ghz

I have 2 Nvidia Geforce 9600GT 512mb of vram they are SLI

I have 4 gb of memory

i also have 410 GB laft on my hard drive

do i reach optimal????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black series at 3.72Ghz</p>
<p>I have 2 Nvidia Geforce 9600GT 512mb of vram they are SLI</p>
<p>I have 4 gb of memory</p>
<p>i also have 410 GB laft on my hard drive</p>
<p>do i reach optimal????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Almafuerte</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/05/22/starcraft-2-system-requirements-revealed/#comment-11399</link>
		<dc:creator>Almafuerte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 04:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/?p=970#comment-11399</guid>
		<description>And, if you are really butt hurt.  feel free to reply to almafuerte (at) gmail {dot} com

I won&#039;t be checking back this page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, if you are really butt hurt.  feel free to reply to almafuerte (at) gmail {dot} com</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t be checking back this page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Almafuerte</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/05/22/starcraft-2-system-requirements-revealed/#comment-11398</link>
		<dc:creator>Almafuerte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 04:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/?p=970#comment-11398</guid>
		<description>One comment to all the gamers that think they know shit about software. 

I am not a gamer, I am a coder, and I do understand (unlike most of you gamers that stop at pci card swapping) hardware. 

There is no real difference between an integrated graphics adapter and a PCIe/PCI/AGP/Anyotherbus card. Let&#039;s consider that you have two machines, one with an integrated card, the other with a PCIe card. Both have the same chip (let&#039;s say, an NVIDIA 6800). They are both connected to the same bus, logically speaking, the Physical path is different, but they connect to the same bus, have the same chip with the same capabilities, and will deliver the same performance. Now, the difference is that the PCIe card will have its own memory, and the integrated one will draw memory from your system. Nowdays, graphic cards use the same DDR2 memory than your machine. The connection is a little bit more indirect, which means less bandwidth between GPU and memory, but it won&#039;t be that noticeable. Otherwise, it&#039;s exactly the same card. So, being integrated is not a bad thing at all. 

The thing is that most times you will be comparing a cutting-edge 9000 series PCIe card with 1 GB of dedicated RAM to an old 6000 series that is sharing a max of 128 MB from your main memory. Or you&#039;ll be comparing an Intel card to an NVIDIA card. 

Anyway, Intel GPUs are much, much better than nvidia&#039;s GPUs. Why?
Here is why: 

 - Intel has decent, fully open source drivers. NVIDIA has shitty, privative drivers. 
 - Intel has fully disclosed their specs. NVIDIA hasn&#039;t. 
 - Intel has gotten very close to NVIDIA&#039;s performance in only a few years of development, they&#039;ll beat them and ATI in a few more years. 
 - Intel is an OpenGL supporter, and they are not suggesting we all move into the windows-only Directshit. 

So, I don&#039;t care if you can get a few more FPSs out of your NVIDIA card, or if it has the BullShitPrivativeIncompatibleWithStandardOpenGL (TM) extension. Intel plays nicer, and doesn&#039;t require me to sell my soul to some crappy EULA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One comment to all the gamers that think they know shit about software. </p>
<p>I am not a gamer, I am a coder, and I do understand (unlike most of you gamers that stop at pci card swapping) hardware. </p>
<p>There is no real difference between an integrated graphics adapter and a PCIe/PCI/AGP/Anyotherbus card. Let&#8217;s consider that you have two machines, one with an integrated card, the other with a PCIe card. Both have the same chip (let&#8217;s say, an NVIDIA 6800). They are both connected to the same bus, logically speaking, the Physical path is different, but they connect to the same bus, have the same chip with the same capabilities, and will deliver the same performance. Now, the difference is that the PCIe card will have its own memory, and the integrated one will draw memory from your system. Nowdays, graphic cards use the same DDR2 memory than your machine. The connection is a little bit more indirect, which means less bandwidth between GPU and memory, but it won&#8217;t be that noticeable. Otherwise, it&#8217;s exactly the same card. So, being integrated is not a bad thing at all. </p>
<p>The thing is that most times you will be comparing a cutting-edge 9000 series PCIe card with 1 GB of dedicated RAM to an old 6000 series that is sharing a max of 128 MB from your main memory. Or you&#8217;ll be comparing an Intel card to an NVIDIA card. </p>
<p>Anyway, Intel GPUs are much, much better than nvidia&#8217;s GPUs. Why?<br />
Here is why: </p>
<p> &#8211; Intel has decent, fully open source drivers. NVIDIA has shitty, privative drivers.<br />
 &#8211; Intel has fully disclosed their specs. NVIDIA hasn&#8217;t.<br />
 &#8211; Intel has gotten very close to NVIDIA&#8217;s performance in only a few years of development, they&#8217;ll beat them and ATI in a few more years.<br />
 &#8211; Intel is an OpenGL supporter, and they are not suggesting we all move into the windows-only Directshit. </p>
<p>So, I don&#8217;t care if you can get a few more FPSs out of your NVIDIA card, or if it has the BullShitPrivativeIncompatibleWithStandardOpenGL (TM) extension. Intel plays nicer, and doesn&#8217;t require me to sell my soul to some crappy EULA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jarmanator</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/05/22/starcraft-2-system-requirements-revealed/#comment-10533</link>
		<dc:creator>jarmanator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 01:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/?p=970#comment-10533</guid>
		<description>2.5 GHz Intel core 2 duo
2Gb DDR 2 ram
NVidia 8600m GT 512Mb 

Should be fine.......:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2.5 GHz Intel core 2 duo<br />
2Gb DDR 2 ram<br />
NVidia 8600m GT 512Mb </p>
<p>Should be fine&#8230;&#8230;.:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

