• StarCraft 2 Blog on Facebook
April Fools’ Tauren Marine; 10 Year StarCraft Interview

This year’s Blizzard’s April Fools’ stunt introduces a new unit that’s going to leave a heavy hoofprint on the StarCraft universe: The Tauren Marine. This fictional-fictional unit was born in a crossover between the WarCraft and StarCraft universes, and the end result is a superunit of epic proportions.

Tauren Marine

Tauren Marine

Trains From: Mulgore
Armament: 88mm Impala Gauss Rifle
Role: Shock Troops


The Tauren Marine is not much more than a Marine with extra damage, health, and a shield. Make sure to watch the video in the Tauren Marine page to see a small group of them going through a Terran base, obliterating it in a few seconds.



* Click for Big

The obscure planet of Azeroth was found to harbor a dizzying selection of humans, mutants, and aliens in a state of perpetual superstition and conflict. The most physically imposing of these warrior races were the so-called ‘tauren,’ an anthropomorphic bovine genotype with super-human stamina, overpowered racial combat abilities, and bizarrely well-developed horticultural skills.



* Click for Big

While most tauren were satisfied with their agrarian culture and primitive existence, the Confederacy was able to lure away large numbers of young bulls for a life of adventure and violence along the galactic rim. Other tauren referred to these adventurers as ‘mad cows,’ and they were ostracized from the rest of their kine. The newly created tauren marines didn’t care–they got neat-looking armor and big guns to own everyone else with. These beefy new soldiers are now an integral part of the Confederate military, and have managed to horn in on the roles traditionally filled by firebats and other infantry units.


* Click for Big

We are very likely to encounter the Tauren Marine again in StarCraft 2 – even if not in the full game, Blizzard is undoubtedly going to include this abomination in the map editor.




IGN has conducted an extensive interview with some of Blizzard’s main developers: Chris Sigaty, lead tester; Sam Didier, art director; and Frank Pearce, a Blizzard cofounder and now executive vice president of product development. They discuss the development process of the original StarCraft, how they perceived it back then, and how they felt when it started becoming popular. All in all, a very interesting read which provides an insight into the minds of the Blizzard developers. Here are a few highlights:

IGN: How did the idea for StarCraft first come about?


Sam Didier: Back in the day, after we did Warcraft, we were kind of thinking, “Well cool, should we do another one?” Everyone was kind of geeked-up about doing a science fiction one. We had entertained ideas–we were still kind of small back then–but we entertained ideas like, “Oh, maybe we could do something with the Star Wars guys?” And at the end of the day we kind of just thought, “You know what? We’d probably have more fun just doing something on our own.” We wouldn’t have to worry about the licensing guys saying, “No, you can have those guys shoot like that because they don’t shoot like that in the movies.” So we just kind of decided to screw that. Let’s do our own thing, then we could be or our own creative control.

IGN: That’s kind of the story about StarCraft: It’s like the national game of Korea. Do you have theories about how that came about?


Chris Sigaty: There is a lot of theories about it, and the one that I hear that seems to make sense is: right place, right time. Korea being in a recession, the game being available for the public to play–being a great game and well balanced–and these game rooms popping up all across Seoul. And it sort of building up along with the economy at the time, and StarCraft just being that really well-balanced competitive game, the nature of the Korean community being competitive, all those actors combining into this weird, cool crazy phenomenon.

Excellent responses to the next questions reveal the different qualities of StarCraft. It’s interesting to see what each developer has to say, answering from his perspective:

IGN: StarCraft has sold over 9.5 million copies worldwide. Everyone agrees it’s a great game. But there has to be a reason it caught on as it did, worldwide. Because many great games don’t sell anywhere as close to what StarCraft has done. Do you attribute to Battle.net? What do you think is the catalyst?


Frank Pearce: Definitely Battle.net is a factor. The personality that we inject into the experience through the sounds; the personality that we inject through the portraits. Because the units are only so high. Looking at it from the top-down perspective, the units have a distinct look, but they don’t have a lot of visual personality beyond their distinct look. But when you throw the portrait of the unit on the screen and you give it that voice, all of a sudden you’ve injected personality into this.


Chris Sigaty: The thing that we’ve always done–not me personally, but the company–has ended up hitting on are these sort of common themes. Grabbing the right portions of these common themes so that it’s more accessible, so it’s the coolest aspects of those things. So the coolest parts of the Star Wars thing, and the coolest parts of the characters and the story, and they all end up adding to why those games, and why particularly Blizzard does well, or why StarCraft does well in a situation where another great game didn’t necessarily, maybe that accessibility? Not always necessarily due to the actual user interface or that sort of thing, but really the big themes that are there.


Sam Didier: I kind of attribute the longevity of it, it all boils down for me to the gameplay. Because I look at the art now, and it’s horrible. [laughter]. It’s not the art that’s keeping the game going. But the gameplay is super fun, everyone loves to play it. It’s simple to play, but if you want to be a bad ass, it also has that component of the game. It’s sort of like chess. The art is nothing really great to look at; it works, but it’s still a fun game to play. You can play it against your friend; it doesn’t take four hours to play a game, you can play a couple of games at lunch, and you’re done. It has a good, timeless feel to it.

What really happened to StarCraft: Ghost?

IGN: Let’s talk about StarCraft Ghost. What was the thought about spinning StarCraft into an action game, and what happened to that project?


Frank Pearce: One of the challenges that we face here is that we never have a shortage of great ideas. The challenge we always face is that we only have so many resources available to us to actually implement those ideas. And so we have to be able to pick and choose which great ideas we’re able to execute on. And at the time, we just didn’t have the bandwidth for everything we were doing. When we were working on Ghost, we were working on StarCraft II, it just wasn’t publicly known that we were working on StarCraft II. And we also had World of Warcraft that we were supporting, and we had no idea when we launched World of Warcraft that we end up supporting a subscriber base of 10 million people, right? We anticipated in North America when we first launched WoW, that we were going to be supporting a subscriber base of 400,000 people, and we had 400,000 subscribers in the first month.


So, for us, it was just a matter of focus and resources and what made the most sense for us to focus on, and with World of Warcraft growing as quickly as it did, that had to be our primary focus. That’s not to say that Ghost wasn’t fun, and wasn’t shaping up with a lot of potential, but we had to choose.

Check out the rest of the interview over at IGN.

Be Sociable, Share!

Related Posts:

30 Comments to “April Fools’ Tauren Marine; 10 Year StarCraft Interview”

  1. martix — April 3, 2008 @ 12:41 pm

    Ohh… first post 😛 Hehe
    At first when a friend told me about that tauren marine i wasn’t sure how to take it… Began to wonder if he had seen something wrong or was he joking with me. Then I saw this and remembered it was an april fools’ thingy. :) Had me worried there for a time. 😛

  2. Rob — April 3, 2008 @ 1:41 pm

    yes i, too, was worried first. damn i really prayed for the taurens to be taken out of the game again. well, i guess we were lucky…

  3. Luke — April 3, 2008 @ 1:42 pm

    When i saw Tauren Marine i was like…. What the … Did Blizzard lost their creativity? Must they use something from Warcraft to make a “new” unit? They are messing up the SC universe!!! Then I start to watch the video, and saw five Tauren Marine destroyed Command Centre with few shots, and it seems like regular marines died in batches (might have splash damage too) I was like…. That is too freaking strong, something’s not right. Then I realize it was April Fool’s……

  4. Ken — April 3, 2008 @ 4:10 pm

    WOW!!! I LOVE THIS UNIT!!! I bet it has “pulverize” too. hahaha please, oh please put this freak on the map editor. along with other freakazoids you guys come up with in the future. I love you guys!!! This is so good!

  5. SteelVelocity — April 3, 2008 @ 4:39 pm

    The screenshots look like they were made before the graphics update…. I wonder if SC2 will be in Beta by WW1?

  6. Lonia — April 3, 2008 @ 4:50 pm

    Fools! don’s lose your faith in blizzard

  7. brainlessant — April 3, 2008 @ 5:07 pm

    I bet its available in the map editor…xD

  8. George — April 3, 2008 @ 5:51 pm

    Of course it’ll be

  9. brainlessant — April 3, 2008 @ 10:45 pm

    Lol i just realized their weapon…
    88mm….the bullet is as big as the 88mm flak cannon…xD

  10. Nattaboy — April 3, 2008 @ 11:40 pm

    It better be in the map editor.

    I thought it was an april fool’s straight away when I read the unit page.
    I also like the random trigger-happy murloc XD

  11. clay_mourn — April 4, 2008 @ 5:04 am

    you guys actually fell for it. lol

  12. Nattaboy — April 5, 2008 @ 9:55 pm

    Its a shame about ghost, I thought it was looking like it could be a great game.

  13. i luv guardians — April 6, 2008 @ 1:37 am

    although this is outta the topic, i wuld like to bring some attention to the crucio siege tanks. something is amiss…it seemed lousier than b4…..it took out a few marines wif 3 shots and originally it can kill a medic wif 1 but now it takes 2…its gettin disturbing if siege tanks start to suck

  14. clay_mourn — April 6, 2008 @ 6:04 am

    the seige tank(crucio or articulate) could never kill a medic 1 shot

  15. Dill — April 6, 2008 @ 7:08 pm

    We also don’t know the resource cost of all of this. However, if terrans are developed in such a way that they don’t need siege tanks as much, than tanks probably wouldn’t need to be as powerful. Also, if the tank mode is more powerful, the siege mode might need to be made a bit less powerful to compensate. (Or some other changes are occurring with costs, build times, etc.)

  16. i luv guardians — April 7, 2008 @ 3:15 am

    yeah come to think of it, you are right…siege tanks cant kill medics wif one shot! hmm.but it does seem a bit louser dealing wif marines….might be interesting seeing how tank mode be more powerful than b4

  17. i luv guardians — April 7, 2008 @ 3:23 am

    if im not wrong, the siege tanks will be more expensive than it is b4. but smt is wrong wif the terran faction juz yet…it seems like the other two races are goin strong but the terran is not equipped wif handling the powers of the two races. thor seemed incredibly less powerful wif the loss of the shoulder guns and only thing left is battlecruisers which can be easily destroyed by both the corruptor and the mothership. in my opinion, the viking sucks, seeing that its ground attack is like goliaths and its air attack doesnt hurt much either. ps, i am a noob player so it wuld be great if you all help me out wif these stuff…plz gimme some comments. thanks

  18. meo123 — April 7, 2008 @ 9:14 am

    Yeah I don’t like the vikings either. It’s annoying to see them having missle pods on their shoulders in walking mode but couldn’t lauch any missle at all. They have gatling guns but they fire a few bullets and stop and then fire again. What is the point of having high fire rate gatling guns here anyway?

  19. Nattaboy — April 7, 2008 @ 1:25 pm

    Has banshee got AoE missiles back yet? If not…

    (insert angry smiley here)
    and they should have a proper dedicated air-to-air fighter.

  20. meo123 — April 8, 2008 @ 3:28 am

    Lol the idea of choppers shoot down high speed jet fighters. That’s also funny if Blizzard keeps banshees air-to-air units…

  21. i luv guardians — April 9, 2008 @ 8:41 am

    agreed. terran cant do wifout dedicated air to air fighters

  22. marine — April 12, 2008 @ 6:49 pm

    Hmm……I wonder if theres an april fool’s cheat blizzard is going to make on that monstrous marine,ah well,APRIL FOOLS TO STARCRAFT 2

  23. ghost — April 12, 2008 @ 7:01 pm

    AHH MAN.The mighty thor’s bombardment has been remove from blizzard,to be replaced by the anti-air ability.but I think blizzard is thinking about it,or maybe……………………………well,we’ll just have to find out about on the sc2 news

  24. Miss44 — October 22, 2009 @ 5:53 pm

    Every one of em oughta be punched in the nuts. ,

  25. canada goose ebay — January 31, 2012 @ 1:57 pm

    There are certainly a lot of details like that to take into consideration. That is a great point to bring up. I offer the thoughts above as general inspiration but clearly there are questions like the one you bring up where the most important thing will be working in honest good faith. I don?t know if best practices have emerged around things like that, but I am sure that your job is clearly identified as a fair game. Both boys and girls feel the impact of just a moment’s pleasure, for the rest of their lives.

  26. hair loss cure for man — August 28, 2014 @ 4:34 am

    Pretty! This was an incredibly womderful article. Many thanks
    for supplying this information.

    My blog post: hair loss cure for man

  27. Domus Umzug Entrümpelung — October 3, 2014 @ 7:49 pm

    When someone writes an piece of writing he/she retains the
    thought of a user in his/her mind that how a user can be aware of it.
    So that’s why this piece of writing is perfect.

  28. Scheidungsanwalt in Mainz — October 4, 2014 @ 2:18 am

    Why visitors still make use of to read news papers when in this technological globe everything is available
    on web?

  29. Super Dragon 6000 Delay Spray — October 12, 2014 @ 8:03 pm

    Wonderful, what a web ite it is! Thiss web site gives valuable facts to us, keep it up.

    Here iss my blog Super Dragon 6000 Delay Spray

  30. car finance packages — December 21, 2014 @ 1:45 am

    hi!,I ove your writinhg very much! percentage we keep
    up a corrrespondence extra about your article on AOL?
    I require an expert on this space to unravel my problem.
    May be that is you! Taking a look ahgead too peer you.

    Feel frse to visit my page; car finance packages

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Write a comment




All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
All the Rest © SC2 blog 2007-2010