<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Summarizing December’s Monthly Discussion: Artistic Direction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/01/21/summarizing-december%e2%80%99s-monthly-discussion-artistic-direction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/01/21/summarizing-december%e2%80%99s-monthly-discussion-artistic-direction/</link>
	<description>The Official Unofficial StarCraft 2 Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 14:12:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mihael</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/01/21/summarizing-december%e2%80%99s-monthly-discussion-artistic-direction/#comment-2395</link>
		<dc:creator>Mihael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 13:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/01/21/summarizing-december%e2%80%99s-monthly-discussion-artistic-direction/#comment-2395</guid>
		<description>Blizzard is taking the life out of SC2:
http://www.mihaelklampfer.com/starcraft2_gone_bad/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blizzard is taking the life out of SC2:<br />
<a href="http://www.mihaelklampfer.com/starcraft2_gone_bad/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mihaelklampfer.com/starcraft2_gone_bad/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: battlarmd</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/01/21/summarizing-december%e2%80%99s-monthly-discussion-artistic-direction/#comment-2077</link>
		<dc:creator>battlarmd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/01/21/summarizing-december%e2%80%99s-monthly-discussion-artistic-direction/#comment-2077</guid>
		<description>I agree, the consolidation work there is great, a true hand of applause is due here.

*and the audiences all stands and applaud*

I sure hope blizzard will find our input from age old gamers valueable and helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, the consolidation work there is great, a true hand of applause is due here.</p>
<p>*and the audiences all stands and applaud*</p>
<p>I sure hope blizzard will find our input from age old gamers valueable and helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/01/21/summarizing-december%e2%80%99s-monthly-discussion-artistic-direction/#comment-2056</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/01/21/summarizing-december%e2%80%99s-monthly-discussion-artistic-direction/#comment-2056</guid>
		<description>Q&amp; A Batch 27 is up!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q&amp; A Batch 27 is up!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/01/21/summarizing-december%e2%80%99s-monthly-discussion-artistic-direction/#comment-2053</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/01/21/summarizing-december%e2%80%99s-monthly-discussion-artistic-direction/#comment-2053</guid>
		<description>lol my post about the nomad was featured =P anyways it wasn&#039;t really a complaint, it was more like an observation i guess. to me its all gonna boil down to when i actually play the game instead of just looking at screenshots/videos that may be misleading(might not look or feel the same when you&#039;re actually playing it) so my comment about the nomad is really just an observation/first impression. cheers sc2 blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol my post about the nomad was featured =P anyways it wasn&#8217;t really a complaint, it was more like an observation i guess. to me its all gonna boil down to when i actually play the game instead of just looking at screenshots/videos that may be misleading(might not look or feel the same when you&#8217;re actually playing it) so my comment about the nomad is really just an observation/first impression. cheers sc2 blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Kaplan</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/01/21/summarizing-december%e2%80%99s-monthly-discussion-artistic-direction/#comment-2034</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Kaplan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/01/21/summarizing-december%e2%80%99s-monthly-discussion-artistic-direction/#comment-2034</guid>
		<description>Well, I just wanted to give a bit of thanks for featuring all of those comments I wrote awhile back. I was pleasantly surprised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I just wanted to give a bit of thanks for featuring all of those comments I wrote awhile back. I was pleasantly surprised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/01/21/summarizing-december%e2%80%99s-monthly-discussion-artistic-direction/#comment-2032</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/01/21/summarizing-december%e2%80%99s-monthly-discussion-artistic-direction/#comment-2032</guid>
		<description>Yea I also don&#039;t mind the super saturated look, But it seem to get a bit much. I think it&#039;s the combination of super saturation and a toy-like unit design in some cases. I hope there isn&#039;t a complete turn around in the art - just a few &quot;bring that back a little&quot; moments.

However I don&#039;t like all this &#039;starcraft 2 isn&#039;t starcraft 1 - it&#039;s a new game&#039; stuff. Feels like angst. From what I can see, it&#039;s progressing just fine. Mind you - I&#039;m one who wants a Starcraft 1 multiplayer option!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea I also don&#8217;t mind the super saturated look, But it seem to get a bit much. I think it&#8217;s the combination of super saturation and a toy-like unit design in some cases. I hope there isn&#8217;t a complete turn around in the art &#8211; just a few &#8220;bring that back a little&#8221; moments.</p>
<p>However I don&#8217;t like all this &#8216;starcraft 2 isn&#8217;t starcraft 1 &#8211; it&#8217;s a new game&#8217; stuff. Feels like angst. From what I can see, it&#8217;s progressing just fine. Mind you &#8211; I&#8217;m one who wants a Starcraft 1 multiplayer option!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/01/21/summarizing-december%e2%80%99s-monthly-discussion-artistic-direction/#comment-2031</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/01/21/summarizing-december%e2%80%99s-monthly-discussion-artistic-direction/#comment-2031</guid>
		<description>Stacraft II sera el mejor juego si se cumplen con todos estos comentarios ademas de que tenemos 10 años esperandolo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stacraft II sera el mejor juego si se cumplen con todos estos comentarios ademas de que tenemos 10 años esperandolo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whiteknight</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/01/21/summarizing-december%e2%80%99s-monthly-discussion-artistic-direction/#comment-2029</link>
		<dc:creator>whiteknight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/01/21/summarizing-december%e2%80%99s-monthly-discussion-artistic-direction/#comment-2029</guid>
		<description>New Starcraft 2 Unit Footage (7-28-07) 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9SQ7tuLrXI</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Starcraft 2 Unit Footage (7-28-07) </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9SQ7tuLrXI" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9SQ7tuLrXI</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ø, î ç! ß⁄Lß⁄L</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/01/21/summarizing-december%e2%80%99s-monthly-discussion-artistic-direction/#comment-2028</link>
		<dc:creator>Ø, î ç! ß⁄Lß⁄L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/01/21/summarizing-december%e2%80%99s-monthly-discussion-artistic-direction/#comment-2028</guid>
		<description>2nd commment! woo! i agree with steelvelocity, nice work SC2blog. im kinda bummed about the ragging on sc2&#039;s &quot;cartoony&quot; style. i recon it looks great, far better when its annimated. One thing, where r the snow levels! from what ive seen from the screenshots, 80% of sc2 is gonna be in nagrand!!! well i certainly hope bliz dishes out some more landscapes than &quot;dead ground&quot; &quot;scifi platforming&quot; and &quot;grass&quot;. still i actually like the glowing visuals despite what people have been saying. also the green sci blades r kinda cool imo (i have yet to see a green twiligth archon).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2nd commment! woo! i agree with steelvelocity, nice work SC2blog. im kinda bummed about the ragging on sc2&#8242;s &#8220;cartoony&#8221; style. i recon it looks great, far better when its annimated. One thing, where r the snow levels! from what ive seen from the screenshots, 80% of sc2 is gonna be in nagrand!!! well i certainly hope bliz dishes out some more landscapes than &#8220;dead ground&#8221; &#8220;scifi platforming&#8221; and &#8220;grass&#8221;. still i actually like the glowing visuals despite what people have been saying. also the green sci blades r kinda cool imo (i have yet to see a green twiligth archon).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteelVelocity</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/01/21/summarizing-december%e2%80%99s-monthly-discussion-artistic-direction/#comment-2027</link>
		<dc:creator>SteelVelocity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2008/01/21/summarizing-december%e2%80%99s-monthly-discussion-artistic-direction/#comment-2027</guid>
		<description>Well written SC2Blog. You deserve a round of applause for your dedication and devotion to the Blizzard community. I only hope the development team will take a serious look at you constructive criticism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well written SC2Blog. You deserve a round of applause for your dedication and devotion to the Blizzard community. I only hope the development team will take a serious look at you constructive criticism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
