<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blizzard and Activision Merge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/12/02/blizzard-and-activision-merge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/12/02/blizzard-and-activision-merge/</link>
	<description>The Official Unofficial StarCraft 2 Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:29:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Arthur Santana</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/12/02/blizzard-and-activision-merge/#comment-1665</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur Santana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/12/02/blizzard-and-activision-merge/#comment-1665</guid>
		<description>WOW! Just confirmed on wikipedia that Blizzard made these games Jebbou just talked about! Incredible, now I love them even more! haha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW! Just confirmed on wikipedia that Blizzard made these games Jebbou just talked about! Incredible, now I love them even more! haha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jebbou</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/12/02/blizzard-and-activision-merge/#comment-1664</link>
		<dc:creator>Jebbou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 15:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/12/02/blizzard-and-activision-merge/#comment-1664</guid>
		<description>Impressive indeed .. Looking at the game list both company seems to complete each other very well.  Blizz is very RTS-MMO-PCRPG oriented, while Activision is more action-console+FPS.

And from what I can see, Activision has a strong background in console gaming which could be put to good use to bring back old franchises from Blizz, such as Blackthorne, Rock&amp;Roll Racing and Lost Vikings. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Impressive indeed .. Looking at the game list both company seems to complete each other very well.  Blizz is very RTS-MMO-PCRPG oriented, while Activision is more action-console+FPS.</p>
<p>And from what I can see, Activision has a strong background in console gaming which could be put to good use to bring back old franchises from Blizz, such as Blackthorne, Rock&amp;Roll Racing and Lost Vikings. <img src='http://www.sc2blog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rikas</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/12/02/blizzard-and-activision-merge/#comment-1663</link>
		<dc:creator>rikas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 13:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/12/02/blizzard-and-activision-merge/#comment-1663</guid>
		<description>For those who say they never heard of Activision here&#039;s a list of games of games published:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Activision_games

It&#039;s an impressive list imo :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who say they never heard of Activision here&#8217;s a list of games of games published:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Activision_games" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Activision_games</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s an impressive list imo <img src='http://www.sc2blog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MechaBeast</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/12/02/blizzard-and-activision-merge/#comment-1662</link>
		<dc:creator>MechaBeast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 13:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/12/02/blizzard-and-activision-merge/#comment-1662</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t Blizzard vision or Blizz-vision be a better name or did they just want to be higher in the yellow pages?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t Blizzard vision or Blizz-vision be a better name or did they just want to be higher in the yellow pages?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lonia</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/12/02/blizzard-and-activision-merge/#comment-1657</link>
		<dc:creator>Lonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 23:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/12/02/blizzard-and-activision-merge/#comment-1657</guid>
		<description>Activision is a good company... guitar hero? call of duty 4?
It may be less known then blizzard but certainly activision put off many Good games</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Activision is a good company&#8230; guitar hero? call of duty 4?<br />
It may be less known then blizzard but certainly activision put off many Good games</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/12/02/blizzard-and-activision-merge/#comment-1654</link>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/12/02/blizzard-and-activision-merge/#comment-1654</guid>
		<description>Given the increasing connections between games and other media (music, movies, etc), it&#039;s a surprise that Vivendi is the only media conglomerate buying gaming companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the increasing connections between games and other media (music, movies, etc), it&#8217;s a surprise that Vivendi is the only media conglomerate buying gaming companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adun</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/12/02/blizzard-and-activision-merge/#comment-1653</link>
		<dc:creator>Adun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 08:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/12/02/blizzard-and-activision-merge/#comment-1653</guid>
		<description>Does anyone even read this page? It says there won&#039;t be any changes to the game right here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone even read this page? It says there won&#8217;t be any changes to the game right here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lipton</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/12/02/blizzard-and-activision-merge/#comment-1652</link>
		<dc:creator>Lipton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 07:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/12/02/blizzard-and-activision-merge/#comment-1652</guid>
		<description>You guys are missing out on the positives here... with Activision, promotion for StarCraft II will be even bigger and reach even more people. They have said many times already in all these reports, that nothing changes in regards to Blizzard gaming development.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys are missing out on the positives here&#8230; with Activision, promotion for StarCraft II will be even bigger and reach even more people. They have said many times already in all these reports, that nothing changes in regards to Blizzard gaming development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/12/02/blizzard-and-activision-merge/#comment-1650</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 01:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/12/02/blizzard-and-activision-merge/#comment-1650</guid>
		<description>quoting mmx:

&quot;This scare the shit out of me …. why such stupid move is needed, there is somethnig fishy behind this.&quot;

lol... certified conspiracy theorist. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quoting mmx:</p>
<p>&#8220;This scare the shit out of me …. why such stupid move is needed, there is somethnig fishy behind this.&#8221;</p>
<p>lol&#8230; certified conspiracy theorist. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/12/02/blizzard-and-activision-merge/#comment-1649</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/12/02/blizzard-and-activision-merge/#comment-1649</guid>
		<description>Quoting rikas:

&quot;You haven’t heard of Activision? Maybe you’re not into games then. It’s a very well known company imo.&quot;

Yes, really... I keep track of new games here in the Phils but I haven&#039;t heard of Activision. The popular games here are all from Blizzard, Sierra, Nintendo, Sega and that company that made C&amp;C. Maybe they haven&#039;t penetrated much in SE Asia.

Anyway, if this helps them improve their development of Starcraft II, then so be it. I don&#039;t mind, as long as Starcraft will continue to prevail. En Taro Adun!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quoting rikas:</p>
<p>&#8220;You haven’t heard of Activision? Maybe you’re not into games then. It’s a very well known company imo.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, really&#8230; I keep track of new games here in the Phils but I haven&#8217;t heard of Activision. The popular games here are all from Blizzard, Sierra, Nintendo, Sega and that company that made C&amp;C. Maybe they haven&#8217;t penetrated much in SE Asia.</p>
<p>Anyway, if this helps them improve their development of Starcraft II, then so be it. I don&#8217;t mind, as long as Starcraft will continue to prevail. En Taro Adun!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
