<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New StarCraft 2 Terran Unit Page: The Battlecruiser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/28/new-starcraft-2-terran-unit-page-the-battlecruiser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/28/new-starcraft-2-terran-unit-page-the-battlecruiser/</link>
	<description>The Official Unofficial StarCraft 2 Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:34:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: location appartement</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/28/new-starcraft-2-terran-unit-page-the-battlecruiser/#comment-66625</link>
		<dc:creator>location appartement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/28/new-starcraft-2-terran-unit-page-the-battlecruiser/#comment-66625</guid>
		<description>Hello  les amis  comment trouvez-vous de mon nouveau blog sur l&#039; immobilier ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello  les amis  comment trouvez-vous de mon nouveau blog sur l&#8217; immobilier ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jose an tonio</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/28/new-starcraft-2-terran-unit-page-the-battlecruiser/#comment-24840</link>
		<dc:creator>jose an tonio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 16:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/28/new-starcraft-2-terran-unit-page-the-battlecruiser/#comment-24840</guid>
		<description>QIERO UN CON VATE EN LINIA CON TRA OTROS Y PA RA VER QIEN ES MOS CNINGON SI LOS MEXICANOS LOS GRINGOS COMO VES EE ESTAR CRAF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QIERO UN CON VATE EN LINIA CON TRA OTROS Y PA RA VER QIEN ES MOS CNINGON SI LOS MEXICANOS LOS GRINGOS COMO VES EE ESTAR CRAF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danee</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/28/new-starcraft-2-terran-unit-page-the-battlecruiser/#comment-11803</link>
		<dc:creator>Danee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/28/new-starcraft-2-terran-unit-page-the-battlecruiser/#comment-11803</guid>
		<description>In Campaign:
1. Wraith do exist (but no in multi)
2. Vikings can have zerg-tech: AOE effect, same like Valkyrie had</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Campaign:<br />
1. Wraith do exist (but no in multi)<br />
2. Vikings can have zerg-tech: AOE effect, same like Valkyrie had</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: i_suk_badly</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/28/new-starcraft-2-terran-unit-page-the-battlecruiser/#comment-10544</link>
		<dc:creator>i_suk_badly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 22:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/28/new-starcraft-2-terran-unit-page-the-battlecruiser/#comment-10544</guid>
		<description>ALSO
 they&#039;re seems to be a lot of Noobs playing/testing BETA, I dont think they all diserve a Beta Key.  THE Roach, and Reaper seem to be a BIG problem for a lot of people, and they want something to be done about it.

ROACH HP 145 ATTACK 18 ARMOR 2  (CANNOT ATTACK AIR)
range, regeneation, extra fast burrowed regeneration (upgraded at Lair)  PLUS movement while burrowed! WTH is up with that?! STRANGE to me anyway

REAPER HP: 80 OR 60 ATTACK ? ARMOR: (probobly light)
FAST PLUS JETPACK zealots, stalkers have no chance, unless charge PLUS blink is upgraded (in which case REAPERS would get owned) 

Reapers are cheaper than/easier to get and faster to build , and mass than stalkers Zealots alone have NO chance!  I saw a video, and protoss player was totally abused, lost probes, and Zealots R 2 slow!! REAPERS destoyed the cannon in 1-2 seconds, and singled-out each Stalker and the Zealots (without CHARGE) way too slow.  

Funnily enough this is way longer than my previous post 
so i DONT BLAME YOU IF YOU DONT READ ALL OF THIS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ALSO<br />
 they&#8217;re seems to be a lot of Noobs playing/testing BETA, I dont think they all diserve a Beta Key.  THE Roach, and Reaper seem to be a BIG problem for a lot of people, and they want something to be done about it.</p>
<p>ROACH HP 145 ATTACK 18 ARMOR 2  (CANNOT ATTACK AIR)<br />
range, regeneation, extra fast burrowed regeneration (upgraded at Lair)  PLUS movement while burrowed! WTH is up with that?! STRANGE to me anyway</p>
<p>REAPER HP: 80 OR 60 ATTACK ? ARMOR: (probobly light)<br />
FAST PLUS JETPACK zealots, stalkers have no chance, unless charge PLUS blink is upgraded (in which case REAPERS would get owned) </p>
<p>Reapers are cheaper than/easier to get and faster to build , and mass than stalkers Zealots alone have NO chance!  I saw a video, and protoss player was totally abused, lost probes, and Zealots R 2 slow!! REAPERS destoyed the cannon in 1-2 seconds, and singled-out each Stalker and the Zealots (without CHARGE) way too slow.  </p>
<p>Funnily enough this is way longer than my previous post<br />
so i DONT BLAME YOU IF YOU DONT READ ALL OF THIS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: i_suk_badly</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/28/new-starcraft-2-terran-unit-page-the-battlecruiser/#comment-10543</link>
		<dc:creator>i_suk_badly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 22:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/28/new-starcraft-2-terran-unit-page-the-battlecruiser/#comment-10543</guid>
		<description>What i&#039;ve heard is that BattleCruisers (in StarCraft II anyway) is pathetically pointless.

This is from Beta Testers 

SO THEY ACTUALLY USED/KILLED them, and i saw a video on youtube where a group of Void Rays ( they changed the name at least in the bata) DESTROYED 2 BC&#039;s within seconds, due to the power beams double their power every few seconds

anyway that&#039;s very long and boring, just thought i would add something, and I DO THINK the BattleCruiser&#039;s ability&#039;s are very cool. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What i&#8217;ve heard is that BattleCruisers (in StarCraft II anyway) is pathetically pointless.</p>
<p>This is from Beta Testers </p>
<p>SO THEY ACTUALLY USED/KILLED them, and i saw a video on youtube where a group of Void Rays ( they changed the name at least in the bata) DESTROYED 2 BC&#8217;s within seconds, due to the power beams double their power every few seconds</p>
<p>anyway that&#8217;s very long and boring, just thought i would add something, and I DO THINK the BattleCruiser&#8217;s ability&#8217;s are very cool. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goomba</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/28/new-starcraft-2-terran-unit-page-the-battlecruiser/#comment-5196</link>
		<dc:creator>goomba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/28/new-starcraft-2-terran-unit-page-the-battlecruiser/#comment-5196</guid>
		<description>they should really consider making the BC&#039;s torps AoE against air, or something.  they have way too many anti-ground AoE weapons.  anti-air might give the BC some of the beloved mutalisk-killing effect we loved in the Valkeries of SC1.  i do love the addition of multiple weaker laser burts, vs one slow, forward-firing burst.  also, the yamato gun is a nuclear blast focused into a beam, not a laser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they should really consider making the BC&#8217;s torps AoE against air, or something.  they have way too many anti-ground AoE weapons.  anti-air might give the BC some of the beloved mutalisk-killing effect we loved in the Valkeries of SC1.  i do love the addition of multiple weaker laser burts, vs one slow, forward-firing burst.  also, the yamato gun is a nuclear blast focused into a beam, not a laser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wychuzord</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/28/new-starcraft-2-terran-unit-page-the-battlecruiser/#comment-2692</link>
		<dc:creator>Wychuzord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/28/new-starcraft-2-terran-unit-page-the-battlecruiser/#comment-2692</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if anyone feels about bc the way I am but they just don&#039;t look as they should. The ones from SC made me love and later play as the Terrans. So basically my point is to make it more SC1 like. 
The SC2 ones with plasma torpedoes installed are not that bad: they got this anchor-like shape of the &quot;nose&quot;(?). Nevertheless this &#039;command part&#039; (bridge?) of the SC2 bc is way too high and wide. The air-to-ground cannons look as ugly as the previous Crucio Siege Tank cannon (the one with sexy lips).
I found it interesting to see how would the bc model look like with a little enlonged neck or the whole ship made slimmer. 

BTW: Many thanks to the author of this blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if anyone feels about bc the way I am but they just don&#8217;t look as they should. The ones from SC made me love and later play as the Terrans. So basically my point is to make it more SC1 like.<br />
The SC2 ones with plasma torpedoes installed are not that bad: they got this anchor-like shape of the &#8220;nose&#8221;(?). Nevertheless this &#8216;command part&#8217; (bridge?) of the SC2 bc is way too high and wide. The air-to-ground cannons look as ugly as the previous Crucio Siege Tank cannon (the one with sexy lips).<br />
I found it interesting to see how would the bc model look like with a little enlonged neck or the whole ship made slimmer. </p>
<p>BTW: Many thanks to the author of this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Em0</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/28/new-starcraft-2-terran-unit-page-the-battlecruiser/#comment-2218</link>
		<dc:creator>Em0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/28/new-starcraft-2-terran-unit-page-the-battlecruiser/#comment-2218</guid>
		<description>I hope Blizzard adds more air units to the Terrans. I think they should bring back both the wraiths and the Valkyries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope Blizzard adds more air units to the Terrans. I think they should bring back both the wraiths and the Valkyries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Censored</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/28/new-starcraft-2-terran-unit-page-the-battlecruiser/#comment-1025</link>
		<dc:creator>Censored</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 17:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/28/new-starcraft-2-terran-unit-page-the-battlecruiser/#comment-1025</guid>
		<description>This comment was so insightful, it got moderated.

Cheers
Anderson Mccutcheon
SC2Blog Editor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This comment was so insightful, it got moderated.</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Anderson Mccutcheon<br />
SC2Blog Editor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dill</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/28/new-starcraft-2-terran-unit-page-the-battlecruiser/#comment-1024</link>
		<dc:creator>Dill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 15:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/28/new-starcraft-2-terran-unit-page-the-battlecruiser/#comment-1024</guid>
		<description>It takes less time than it may appear, the marines take about the same amount of time to take damage and get killed as they do to go through the death and falling over animation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It takes less time than it may appear, the marines take about the same amount of time to take damage and get killed as they do to go through the death and falling over animation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

