<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Official Mothership Discussion: What Our Readers Have To Say</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/10/official-mothership-discussion-what-our-readers-have-to-say/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/10/official-mothership-discussion-what-our-readers-have-to-say/</link>
	<description>The Official Unofficial StarCraft 2 Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:20:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: terran thor</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/10/official-mothership-discussion-what-our-readers-have-to-say/#comment-8862</link>
		<dc:creator>terran thor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/10/official-mothership-discussion-what-our-readers-have-to-say/#comment-8862</guid>
		<description>Wow,when I saw this I was like,what the heck???Its like,blizzard wants protoss to win.I looked over the stats and I learned that IT WILL TAKE 2 YES 2 BATTLECRUISERS TO TAKE THE MOTHER SHIP DOWN.I dont like it.Blizzard should put a ban on this for battle.net or hopfully like what the capagim manager said,mothership are very rare to the portoss.Lets hope RARE means to them,himmmm each player can only have one or two or only in a serten part of the game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow,when I saw this I was like,what the heck???Its like,blizzard wants protoss to win.I looked over the stats and I learned that IT WILL TAKE 2 YES 2 BATTLECRUISERS TO TAKE THE MOTHER SHIP DOWN.I dont like it.Blizzard should put a ban on this for battle.net or hopfully like what the capagim manager said,mothership are very rare to the portoss.Lets hope RARE means to them,himmmm each player can only have one or two or only in a serten part of the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrysrobyn</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/10/official-mothership-discussion-what-our-readers-have-to-say/#comment-1113</link>
		<dc:creator>chrysrobyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 01:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/10/official-mothership-discussion-what-our-readers-have-to-say/#comment-1113</guid>
		<description>Ken,
Why feed the bot?  Every Japanese person knows how to spell Tokyo.  Have you ever met a Japanese person who uses an emoticon sideways?  Likely a bot registering accounts and testing the ability to post and spam.  Future posts will have URLs for SEO.

Of course, if we accept the spelling as correct, it&#039;s likely someone trying to drum up support for a German punk band which appears to have some success.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokio_Hotel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken,<br />
Why feed the bot?  Every Japanese person knows how to spell Tokyo.  Have you ever met a Japanese person who uses an emoticon sideways?  Likely a bot registering accounts and testing the ability to post and spam.  Future posts will have URLs for SEO.</p>
<p>Of course, if we accept the spelling as correct, it&#8217;s likely someone trying to drum up support for a German punk band which appears to have some success.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokio_Hotel" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokio_Hotel</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/10/official-mothership-discussion-what-our-readers-have-to-say/#comment-1111</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 23:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/10/official-mothership-discussion-what-our-readers-have-to-say/#comment-1111</guid>
		<description>Quoting CandyShopGirl:

&quot;Hi all!! 

What do you think about Tokio Hotel? &gt;:)&quot;

Do you mean Tokyo Hotel? I think its cozy, but not very affordable. Its a &quot;not bad&quot; place to stay though. I&#039;ve been there a year ago so maybe its better now... Anyway, what does this have to do with the post? Do you play SC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quoting CandyShopGirl:</p>
<p>&#8220;Hi all!! </p>
<p>What do you think about Tokio Hotel? &gt;:)&#8221;</p>
<p>Do you mean Tokyo Hotel? I think its cozy, but not very affordable. Its a &#8220;not bad&#8221; place to stay though. I&#8217;ve been there a year ago so maybe its better now&#8230; Anyway, what does this have to do with the post? Do you play SC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/10/official-mothership-discussion-what-our-readers-have-to-say/#comment-1110</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 16:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/10/official-mothership-discussion-what-our-readers-have-to-say/#comment-1110</guid>
		<description>instead of choosing that the mothership should be a unique unit or not, Blizzard could start off making it a non-unique unit and then you could choose to upgrade ONE of your motherships to an unique unit. The abilities of the upgraded mothership should not be as devastating as first decided then</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>instead of choosing that the mothership should be a unique unit or not, Blizzard could start off making it a non-unique unit and then you could choose to upgrade ONE of your motherships to an unique unit. The abilities of the upgraded mothership should not be as devastating as first decided then</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CandyShopGirl</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/10/official-mothership-discussion-what-our-readers-have-to-say/#comment-1109</link>
		<dc:creator>CandyShopGirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 07:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/10/official-mothership-discussion-what-our-readers-have-to-say/#comment-1109</guid>
		<description>Hi all!! 
 
What do you think about Tokio Hotel? &gt;:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all!! </p>
<p>What do you think about Tokio Hotel? &gt;:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WTF</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/10/official-mothership-discussion-what-our-readers-have-to-say/#comment-937</link>
		<dc:creator>WTF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/10/official-mothership-discussion-what-our-readers-have-to-say/#comment-937</guid>
		<description>no point in putting in the black hole ability if its not the capital ship. End of story MS = Arbiter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no point in putting in the black hole ability if its not the capital ship. End of story MS = Arbiter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: great player</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/10/official-mothership-discussion-what-our-readers-have-to-say/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>great player</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 04:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/10/official-mothership-discussion-what-our-readers-have-to-say/#comment-687</guid>
		<description>I think that Blizzard take out the black hole was wise, since it is such a powerful weapon, it is not going to be balanced. However, the mothership should still have the ability to fire at air targets. Because if the mothership can&#039;t shoot air targets, the air force of Protoss is way too weak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Blizzard take out the black hole was wise, since it is such a powerful weapon, it is not going to be balanced. However, the mothership should still have the ability to fire at air targets. Because if the mothership can&#8217;t shoot air targets, the air force of Protoss is way too weak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AI</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/10/official-mothership-discussion-what-our-readers-have-to-say/#comment-677</link>
		<dc:creator>AI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 22:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/10/official-mothership-discussion-what-our-readers-have-to-say/#comment-677</guid>
		<description>To the Black Hole - if a Mothership operates with such high levels of energy, why not she creates a black hole only in a supernova-like-explosion way when she comes to her end of life? (or an autodestruction ability?)

The explosion might damage the ground units as well as the black hole consumes the flighters (and ruins?) near the ex-mothership....

just a veery expensive nuclear strike for protoss, used only if necessary, but soo impressive ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the Black Hole &#8211; if a Mothership operates with such high levels of energy, why not she creates a black hole only in a supernova-like-explosion way when she comes to her end of life? (or an autodestruction ability?)</p>
<p>The explosion might damage the ground units as well as the black hole consumes the flighters (and ruins?) near the ex-mothership&#8230;.</p>
<p>just a veery expensive nuclear strike for protoss, used only if necessary, but soo impressive <img src='http://www.sc2blog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starcraft 2</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/10/official-mothership-discussion-what-our-readers-have-to-say/#comment-666</link>
		<dc:creator>Starcraft 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 04:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/10/official-mothership-discussion-what-our-readers-have-to-say/#comment-666</guid>
		<description>ps: now that it&#039;s changed this will not be possible hopefully, with weakened attacks etc.. much needed change</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ps: now that it&#8217;s changed this will not be possible hopefully, with weakened attacks etc.. much needed change</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starcraft 2</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/10/official-mothership-discussion-what-our-readers-have-to-say/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>Starcraft 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 04:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/09/10/official-mothership-discussion-what-our-readers-have-to-say/#comment-665</guid>
		<description>The Mothership would give Protoss an unfair advantage allowing them to have a heavy defensive advantage. They would beable to pick off groups of units and retreat back then repeat, whilst this allows them to expand therfore gathering twice the resources of the enemy. Then when it comes time to fight they would have 2:1 unit ratio compared to the enemy because of this hero like unit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mothership would give Protoss an unfair advantage allowing them to have a heavy defensive advantage. They would beable to pick off groups of units and retreat back then repeat, whilst this allows them to expand therfore gathering twice the resources of the enemy. Then when it comes time to fight they would have 2:1 unit ratio compared to the enemy because of this hero like unit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
