<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Protoss Unit Page: The Dark Templar; New Wallpaper Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/08/16/new-protoss-unit-page-the-dark-templar-new-wallpaper-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/08/16/new-protoss-unit-page-the-dark-templar-new-wallpaper-up/</link>
	<description>The Official Unofficial StarCraft 2 Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:29:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bolduk</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/08/16/new-protoss-unit-page-the-dark-templar-new-wallpaper-up/#comment-6843</link>
		<dc:creator>Bolduk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 23:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/08/16/new-protoss-unit-page-the-dark-templar-new-wallpaper-up/#comment-6843</guid>
		<description>For those who don&#039;t know why they changed the warp-blade for a Scythe, it&#039;s to difference the Dark Templars of the Zealots. (From Blizzard&#039;s words.)

And I think it looks great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who don&#8217;t know why they changed the warp-blade for a Scythe, it&#8217;s to difference the Dark Templars of the Zealots. (From Blizzard&#8217;s words.)</p>
<p>And I think it looks great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronny</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/08/16/new-protoss-unit-page-the-dark-templar-new-wallpaper-up/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 07:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/08/16/new-protoss-unit-page-the-dark-templar-new-wallpaper-up/#comment-231</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with Ken. Just because DTs are going to have sychte like weapons doesn&#039;t mean they are becoming &quot;Warcrafty&quot;. I personally thought it was a nice touch for the DTs and if any of you noticed, Blizzard is trying to keep the &quot;Starcraft&quot; without making it look too much like Starcraft 1. Lastly, when it comes to Zeratul, I think that he will still have his old warp blade... It would be the best thing for him reguarding he was always drawn and portrayed using his blade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with Ken. Just because DTs are going to have sychte like weapons doesn&#8217;t mean they are becoming &#8220;Warcrafty&#8221;. I personally thought it was a nice touch for the DTs and if any of you noticed, Blizzard is trying to keep the &#8220;Starcraft&#8221; without making it look too much like Starcraft 1. Lastly, when it comes to Zeratul, I think that he will still have his old warp blade&#8230; It would be the best thing for him reguarding he was always drawn and portrayed using his blade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/08/16/new-protoss-unit-page-the-dark-templar-new-wallpaper-up/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 04:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/08/16/new-protoss-unit-page-the-dark-templar-new-wallpaper-up/#comment-195</guid>
		<description>what&#039;s so warcrafty about the new DT? which character? I bet the DT will have no other added benefits such as splash damage, nor will it be nerfed with a researchable cloaking. I think it will just be the same DT in Brood War. I bet its function will be the same, its damage,its shield, its HP. Only aesthetics will be changed. unless of course the balance of the 3 races will be shifted drastically. Maybe when details about Zerg will come out, we can tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what&#8217;s so warcrafty about the new DT? which character? I bet the DT will have no other added benefits such as splash damage, nor will it be nerfed with a researchable cloaking. I think it will just be the same DT in Brood War. I bet its function will be the same, its damage,its shield, its HP. Only aesthetics will be changed. unless of course the balance of the 3 races will be shifted drastically. Maybe when details about Zerg will come out, we can tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: St4lk3r</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/08/16/new-protoss-unit-page-the-dark-templar-new-wallpaper-up/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>St4lk3r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 15:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/08/16/new-protoss-unit-page-the-dark-templar-new-wallpaper-up/#comment-189</guid>
		<description>mmm, It&#039;s interesting to see the dark templar with a Double Bladed Scythe-like Warp Blade, but I don&#039;t see the use of a double Bladed Scythe, since in the attack animation the dark templar only uses one of the blades. Although, I&#039;t would be cool if the dark templar could have some sort of &quot;splash&quot; attack where he uses Double Bladed Scythe to damage all enemies near him (in certain radius of course).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mmm, It&#8217;s interesting to see the dark templar with a Double Bladed Scythe-like Warp Blade, but I don&#8217;t see the use of a double Bladed Scythe, since in the attack animation the dark templar only uses one of the blades. Although, I&#8217;t would be cool if the dark templar could have some sort of &#8220;splash&#8221; attack where he uses Double Bladed Scythe to damage all enemies near him (in certain radius of course).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/08/16/new-protoss-unit-page-the-dark-templar-new-wallpaper-up/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 06:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/08/16/new-protoss-unit-page-the-dark-templar-new-wallpaper-up/#comment-186</guid>
		<description>[quote]
I think it is just to be showy, I still wonder why they chose to do a Double Bladed Sythe-like Warp Blade for the DTs they were originally using a single blade as an attack…I still find this interesting…I hope we havea DT with a single warp blade like in the original (in the Editor at least) so we can have a better look anyways, the artwork originally showed Zeratul with a regular warp-blade I wonder why they disided to change that?
[/quote]

The reason prolly being is so is to make it look more &quot;Warcraft&quot;-y which I find totally BS. It was already good, they made it look extremely uglier, not to mention how hideous DTs look like now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote]<br />
I think it is just to be showy, I still wonder why they chose to do a Double Bladed Sythe-like Warp Blade for the DTs they were originally using a single blade as an attack…I still find this interesting…I hope we havea DT with a single warp blade like in the original (in the Editor at least) so we can have a better look anyways, the artwork originally showed Zeratul with a regular warp-blade I wonder why they disided to change that?<br />
[/quote]</p>
<p>The reason prolly being is so is to make it look more &#8220;Warcraft&#8221;-y which I find totally BS. It was already good, they made it look extremely uglier, not to mention how hideous DTs look like now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desruprot</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/08/16/new-protoss-unit-page-the-dark-templar-new-wallpaper-up/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Desruprot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/08/16/new-protoss-unit-page-the-dark-templar-new-wallpaper-up/#comment-165</guid>
		<description>I think it is just to be showy, I still wonder why they chose to do a Double Bladed Sythe-like Warp Blade for the DTs they were originally using a single blade as an attack...I still find this interesting...I hope we havea DT with a single warp blade like in the original (in the Editor at least) so we can have a better look anyways, the artwork originally showed Zeratul with a regular warp-blade I wonder why they disided to change that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is just to be showy, I still wonder why they chose to do a Double Bladed Sythe-like Warp Blade for the DTs they were originally using a single blade as an attack&#8230;I still find this interesting&#8230;I hope we havea DT with a single warp blade like in the original (in the Editor at least) so we can have a better look anyways, the artwork originally showed Zeratul with a regular warp-blade I wonder why they disided to change that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WhiteKnight</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/08/16/new-protoss-unit-page-the-dark-templar-new-wallpaper-up/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>WhiteKnight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/08/16/new-protoss-unit-page-the-dark-templar-new-wallpaper-up/#comment-164</guid>
		<description>why he must uncloak since his ability is perma invisibly ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why he must uncloak since his ability is perma invisibly ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/08/16/new-protoss-unit-page-the-dark-templar-new-wallpaper-up/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 22:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/08/16/new-protoss-unit-page-the-dark-templar-new-wallpaper-up/#comment-163</guid>
		<description>The DT has to be &quot;always cloaked.&quot; That&#039;s the best attribute the Dark Templar has. I don&#039;t see the point of Blizzard having a Dark Templar decloaked at one point in the game, or having to research it in the Dark Obelisk to have it permanently. I&#039;m not that impressed with the way they look in the screenshots though. Hope you can send us a better look in the near future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The DT has to be &#8220;always cloaked.&#8221; That&#8217;s the best attribute the Dark Templar has. I don&#8217;t see the point of Blizzard having a Dark Templar decloaked at one point in the game, or having to research it in the Dark Obelisk to have it permanently. I&#8217;m not that impressed with the way they look in the screenshots though. Hope you can send us a better look in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluefirefox</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/08/16/new-protoss-unit-page-the-dark-templar-new-wallpaper-up/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>bluefirefox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/08/16/new-protoss-unit-page-the-dark-templar-new-wallpaper-up/#comment-162</guid>
		<description>Well, it&#039;s always cloaked, the blue thing is what the user and the detector see, but it&#039;s always cloaked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s always cloaked, the blue thing is what the user and the detector see, but it&#8217;s always cloaked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kane</title>
		<link>http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/08/16/new-protoss-unit-page-the-dark-templar-new-wallpaper-up/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Kane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sc2blog.com/2007/08/16/new-protoss-unit-page-the-dark-templar-new-wallpaper-up/#comment-161</guid>
		<description>&quot;Note that an Observer makes an appearance in the second one, decloaking the Dark Templars and exposing them to attack.&quot;

Yeah, a detector.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Note that an Observer makes an appearance in the second one, decloaking the Dark Templars and exposing them to attack.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, a detector.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
